Letter to President Bush: You Rose from the Canvas

October 10, 2004

Home » Commentary » Letter to President Bush: You Rose from the Canvas

Dear President Bush,

It’s astonishing what preceded your comeback.  First, you got your ears boxed the week before by a debating opponent who reduced you to a series of inane and lethargic utterances.  Then you received another public report emphasizing your error in asserting that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.  At the same time you had to notice many Americans were becoming evermore disenchanted by your relentless and quite preposterous claims that Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein were co-conspirators and Iraq had been a haven for Al-Quaeda. And, inevitably, you got hammered by more news of people being blown up in the streets of Iraq.  That’s now the dominant part of your political resume and probably the first thing history will note, along with your failure to plan to maintain security after your boast: “Mission accomplished.”

On the domestic front, the topics were less emotional but decidedly downbeat.  You must have heard more angry talk about your presiding over the first net loss of jobs since Herbert Hoover resided in the White House.  And lots of folks were still unhappy about the deficit, the G.W. deficit, the one $2.6 trillion deep less than four years after you inherited a surplus greater than $5 trillion.  That’s what happens when even a legendary fiscal conservative increases spending while reducing taxes and cutting revenues.  But there was something that must have troubled you more: your vaunted base – the righteous and even more so – was losing faith in you.  You knew what they were saying: maybe G.W. can’t get it done.

You were in the skillet, all right.  Another debating blowout and you might’ve been able to make immediate plans for permanent residence on the ranch.  But you didn’t get hammered Friday night in St. Louis.  By George, you entered the ring like a guy who’d never been hit.  And you started throwing haymakers.  Your chest wasn’t strapped down on one of those dang podiums.  You were free to step around and get pumped up.  Your opponent, naturally, had those options as well.  And John Kerry walloped you as often as you tattooed him.  But after last week, a draw for a reeling, wartime president is really an electoral victory.

I know you think you won outright.  Of course you do.  Kerry wanted the cameras on you as he spoke, so he often looked at you when making his points, but you undercut that effort.  You didn’t grimace or smirk.  You even joked a few times.  Since the “town hall” audience was effectively embalmed, we can’t be sure how your demeanor played with them, but on TV it looked immeasurably better than your petulance of last week.  Indeed, you were a fount of energy, often bounding up before Kerry had finished speaking to force moderator Charles Gibson to cede you thirty seconds of rebuttal.  And, so often, you overwhelmed the need for rational assessment of your statements.  You did so with repeated assertions of your ability to be “energetic and forceful…firm and consistent… steadfast and strong and determined.”  These Herculean traits were essential, after all, because you’re the one who’s to thank that “freedom is on the march” worldwide.

You have quite a spirit, Mr. President; damn few with your record could have delivered such a convincing performance.  And I say it was a “performance” only because you did it at a certain place and time and in the way you wanted.  But it wasn’t really a performance, not for you.  It was the real you, the essential G.W., the evangelical warrior, the special man chosen by the Almighty to overwhelm the philistines.  You don’t need facts for such a transcendent task.  In this era, a handful of sound-bite friendly distortions will suffice.

Thus, the recent Duelfer report that Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction actually backs you up because the reports indicate Saddam wanted to possess them.  Likewise, all that baloney about Saddam and Osama being allies doesn’t matter because Saddam is gone and probable-Afghan-resident bin Laden is hiding, and Iraq and Afghanistan are joining the community of democratic nations.  I can see why you’re convinced by your rhetoric.  Even as I write this, I’m thinking: maybe this could work.  Isn’t it possible that people will ultimately act in their self-interest?  It’s not only possible.  It’s inevitable.  People will demand democracy.  They’ll do that when they’re ready.  Perhaps they were ready yesterday in Afghanistan.  Lots of people showed up at the polls.  Being able to vote was clearly very important to them.  The democratic experiment resumes in January in Iraq.  Damn the reports there of chaos and death.  To hell with international disapproval.  You don’t need approval.  You said you’re not trying to be popular.  You’re doing what’s right.  You’re on a mission.

While you’ve been obsessed with this mission, Iran and North Korea, as Kerry emphasized, have capitalized on your relative inattention and – real world stuff, Mr. President – actually become the nuclear menaces that Saddam could only fantasize about becoming.  But despite the (internal) barbarism of President Kim and the hidebound nature of many Iranian leaders, don’t we have to cede them the fundamental right that you insist on – the right of self-defense.  Don’t you believe in deterrence?  It’s unlikely the North Koreans and Iranians are planning to physically use their nukes.  If they did, they’d be annihilated.  What they really want is to deter you from attacking them.  And now they can do that.  Just as one democracy has never attacked another, no nuclear-armed nation has ever gone to war with another.  Will these two wretched regimes share their scientific bounties?  They’ll try to if you insist on threatening them.  Make them think you’re coming – the young soldiers of the United States, of course; not you personally – and they’ll open Pandora’s Box.

Let’s definitely call this debate a tie.  Kerry’s superior intellect was neutralized by your adroitness in distorting facts.  According to you, Kerry is outrageous because in twenty years in the senate he voted for tax increases a couple of hundred times, or was it about nine hundred times.  You said both.  It doesn’t matter.  You haven’t read that many pieces of legislation in your life, and you know most voters haven’t, either, and many will listen to you and think: wonderful, George “The Deficit” Bush is going to protect us from that big-spending liberal from Massachusetts.  The fanatical spender in this race is from Massachusetts, but he isn’t Senator Kerry, is he, Mr. President?

Many viewers, including Republican pundits who grinned after the bout, were amazed that Kerry wasn’t more specific in refuting your claims of environmental decency.  You’d fired out a few arcane details about forest fires and mercury and engines and the hydrogen automobile you proposed before claiming, with nary a facial giveaway, that you were “a good steward” of the earth and that air is cleaner since your presidency and water’s better too.  Perhaps you were referring to bottled water.  Kerry merely called your environmental record one of the worst in modern history and lamented your ignorance of global warming.  The exchange was indecisive.  Advantage Bush.

Your base was doubtless pleased by your vow to limit the use of embryonic stem cells in research that could someday lead to the cure of Parkinson’s disease and diabetes and other illnesses.  In a related matter, you also promised not to allow personal opinion to alter your selection of Supreme Court justices.  You said you’re simply looking for those who will strictly interpret the constitution.  The difficulty is that on other occasions you’ve said you need “good conservative judges.”  They’ll try to help you back up your claim there will be “no federal money for abortions.”  Maybe what you’re really angling for is no abortions at all.  Then you would dominate the womb as you now dominate the world.

You, George W. Bush, are (and for four years have been) The Man, king of kings, ruler of the preeminent power on earth, and one who’s inherently convinced of his rectitude.  Have you made mistakes?  Sure, you conceded, but only on the small stuff.  You said you’ve been right on all the “big decisions.”  At present, many people around the world don’t think your big decisions look right.  But that perception could change.  Victory would alter everything.  After all, you were a different man Friday night.

Sincerely,

Tom

George Thomas Clark

George Thomas Clark is the author of Hitler Here, a biographical novel published in India and the Czech Republic as well as the United States. His commentaries for GeorgeThomasClark.com are read in more than 50 countries a month.

Recent Commentary

Books

HITLER HERE is a well researched and lyrically written biographical novel offering first-person stories by the Fuehrer and a variety of other characters. This intimate approach invites the reader to peer into Hitler’s mind, talk to Eva Braun, joust with Goering, Goebbels, and Himmler, debate with the generals, fight on land and at sea and…
See More
Art history and fiction merge to reveal the lives and emotions of great painters Vincent van Gogh, Pablo Picasso, Frida Kahlo, Diego Rivera, William H. Johnson, Lee Krasner, and many others.
See More
This fast-moving collection blends fiction and movie history to illuminate the stimulating lives and careers of noted actors, actresses, and directors. Stars of this book include Humphrey Bogart, Clark Gable, Marilyn Monroe, Bette Davis, Alfred Hitchcock, Clint Eastwood, Cate Blanchett, and Spike Lee.
See More
In this collection of thirty-eight chiseled short stories, George Thomas Clark introduces readers to actors, alcoholics, addicts, writers famous and unknown, a general, a lovelorn farmer, a family besieged by cancer, extraterrestrials threatening the world, a couple time traveling back to a critical battle, a deranged husband chasing his wife, and many more memorable people…
See More
Anne Frank On Tour and Other Stories
This lively collection offers literary short stories founded on History, Love, Need, Excess, and Final Acts.
See More
In lucid prose author George Thomas Clark recalls the challenges of growing up in a family beset by divorce, depression, and alcoholism, and battling similar problems as an adult.
See More
Let’s invite many of the greatest boxers and their contemporaries to tell their own stories, some true, others tales based on history. The result is a fascinating look into the lives and battles of those who thrilled millions but often ruined themselves while so doing.
See More
In a rousing trip through the worlds of basketball and football, George Thomas Clark explores the professional basketball league in Mexico, the Herculean talents of Wilt Chamberlain, the artistry of LeBron James, the brilliance of Bill Walsh, and lots more. Half the stories are nonfiction and others are satirical pieces guided by the unwavering hand of an inspired storyteller.
See More
Get on board this collection of satirical stories, based on news, about the entertaining but absurd and often quite dangerous events following the election of President Donald J. Trump in November 2016 until January 6, 2021, shortly after his loss to Joe Biden.
See More
Join Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush and other notables on a raucous ride into a fictional world infused with facts from one of the roughest political races in modern U.S. history.
See More
History and literary fiction enliven the Barack Obama phenomenon from the African roots of his father and grandfather to the United States where young Obama struggles to control vices and establish his racial identity. Soon, the young politician is soaring but under fire from a variety of adversaries including Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, and Rush Limbaugh.
See More
These satirical columns allow startlingly candid Saddam Hussein and George W. Bush to explain their need to control the destinies of countries, regions, and, ultimately, the world. Osama bin Laden, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Karl Rove, and other notables, not all famous, also demand part of the stage.
See More
Where Will We Sleep
Determined to learn more about those who fate did not favor, the author toured tattered, handmade refuges of those without homes and interviewed them on the streets and in homeless shelters, and conversed with the poor in the United States, Mexico, Ecuador, and Spain, and on occasion wrote composite stories to illuminate their difficult lives.
See More
In search of stimulating stories, the author interviewed prostitutes in Madrid, Mexico City, Havana, and Managua and on many boulevards in the United States, and he talked to detectives and rode the rough roads of social workers who deal with human trafficking, which is contemporary slavery, and sometimes used several lives to create stories, and everywhere he ventured he witnessed struggles of those whose lives are bound In Other Hands.
See More
In compressed language Clark presents a compilation of short stories and creative columns about relationships between men and women.
See More
Political Satire for Progressives
Available now in a single digital-only volume of four books: Echoes from Saddam Hussein, Obama on Edge, King Donald, and Down Goes Trump. In his signature style, George Thomas Clark combines satire and creative writing to illuminate many historic developments this century. Echoes from Saddam Hussein – Saddam Hussein and George W. Bush candidly explain their need to control the…
See More