Take Note, Security Moms: Kerry Manhandles Bush in First Debate

October 2, 2004

Home » Commentary » Take Note, Security Moms: Kerry Manhandles Bush in First Debate

Many folks from all points on the political spectrum had begun conceding the election to our robust and resolute warrior-president.  They had to.  The polls were revealing the most horrifying perception of John Kerry.  Married middle class white women, whose support he’d been counting on, had decided he couldn’t protect them as well as George W. Bush, and about ten percent of them skedaddled into the president’s embrace, pumping him into a lead of several points.  As a reward, the “soccer moms” were given the weightier designation “security moms” and, at least by allusion, the assurance that all aspects of life would be better in the arms of the one true stud.

But that wasn’t all, I was sure, and resolved to conduct my own poll.  Thursday morning before the first debate, I faced the adult students in my English as a Second Language class.  The group was overwhelmingly Mexican and female, and of course they readily proclaimed their dislike of most Republicans, even the post-celluloid Arnold.   I nevertheless suspected they were withholding something.

“Do you think Bush looks good?” I asked.

“I don’t like him… He doesn’t care about us…”

“Do you think he looks good?”

The room was silent.

“I said, ‘Does Bush look good?’”

“Yes,” at least twenty women said in unison.

It’s about over, I thought.  If these non-voting but aggrieved females think the president is attractive, imagine how the security moms feel.  Poor Kerry.  Legions are joking about his orange face and his flip-flopping and questioning his manhood in Viet Nam and his worthiness to be a leader.  He’s really about to be overwhelmed.  But there is a debate tonight, I reasoned.  Let’s see happens.

A little after nine p.m. Eastern time John Kerry, tanned, towering at six-foot-four, and determined, strode onto the stage and smiled as he pumped the smaller hand of George W. Bush.  This image was an omen.  While Bush spent much of the evening hunched over the podium, grimacing and pouting, Kerry stood erect as he stated the United States is safer when leading strong alliances, and that diverting the real war on terror in Afghanistan – where Osama bin Laden likely was and is – was a “colossal error in judgment.”  Now, Kerry noted, the United States is suffering ninety percent of the casualties and bearing ninety percent of the cost of the war in Iraq.  And Iraq, he stressed, “was not even close to the center of terror” before Bush attacked it.

The president, thoroughly programmed by his theretofore effective but not terribly artful advisers, quoted Kerry as calling Iraq “the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time,” and said you can’t lead like that.  You can’t lead if you change positions as politics change.  Nor can you lead if you send mixed messages.  And if you say it’s the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time, that’s bad.  You can’t keep changing positions.  Nation building is hard work.  It’s all hard work.  And that work is undermined when you call Iraq the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time.  You keep changing.  Stop that.  Actually, keep it up, Kerry, look at the polls.  My message is getting across.

To ensure that his audience of sixty million got it, as well as to compensate for his apparent inability to say anything else, Bush continued to repeat his few stale points until even chief strategist Karl Rove must have winced.  It was getting late, well past his bedtime, and the alpha president was not delivering his simple lines with much energy.

Excepting the aforementioned sound-bites brought in cold and stiff from the stump, Bush’s most unfortunate line was that Saddam would have been “stronger and tougher” if he, George W., hadn’t attacked Iraq.  That is a blatant falsehood.  Who really believes that Saddam was getting, or had any prospect of getting, stronger and tougher?  By any standard, he’d been getting weaker and older since the Gulf War in 1991 when Bush’s father put together a politically and militarily powerful international coalition and said at the time and later in his book that it would have been unwise to continue the invasion and become mired in attritional warfare in the city streets of Babylon.  Economic warfare was waged instead, and the sanctions strangled the Iraqi military machine and starved the citizens.  By the spring of 2003, Saddam and Iraq were in fact a threat only to themselves, not to the United States.

In contrast to the president, who must have guzzled a large Shirley Temple with extra sugar before the debate, Kerry appeared to have downed a testosterone cocktail.  Standing ever straight and often using his large hands for emphasis, he articulated points that are more nuanced than the Bush administration is accustomed to: bringing countries together is essential; a “fresh start and new credibility” will enable the United States to build much stronger alliances; vigorously pursuing a democratic victory in Iraq is vital but so is ensuring that the Iraqi people understand the United States “has no long term designs” on their country.

That is diplomacy.  That is strong leadership.  That is coherent vision and a huge contrast to the incessant and petulant cheap-shots by a president who didn’t much want to debate or even discuss.  A lot of the security moms no doubt noticed.  And ladies, like nations, often reassess who really can best protect them.

George Thomas Clark

George Thomas Clark is the author of Hitler Here, a biographical novel published in India and the Czech Republic as well as the United States. His commentaries for GeorgeThomasClark.com are read in more than 50 countries a month.

Recent Commentary

Books

HITLER HERE is a well researched and lyrically written biographical novel offering first-person stories by the Fuehrer and a variety of other characters. This intimate approach invites the reader to peer into Hitler’s mind, talk to Eva Braun, joust with Goering, Goebbels, and Himmler, debate with the generals, fight on land and at sea and…
See More
Art history and fiction merge to reveal the lives and emotions of great painters Vincent van Gogh, Pablo Picasso, Frida Kahlo, Diego Rivera, William H. Johnson, Lee Krasner, and many others.
See More
This fast-moving collection blends fiction and movie history to illuminate the stimulating lives and careers of noted actors, actresses, and directors. Stars of this book include Humphrey Bogart, Clark Gable, Marilyn Monroe, Bette Davis, Alfred Hitchcock, Clint Eastwood, Cate Blanchett, and Spike Lee.
See More
In this collection of thirty-eight chiseled short stories, George Thomas Clark introduces readers to actors, alcoholics, addicts, writers famous and unknown, a general, a lovelorn farmer, a family besieged by cancer, extraterrestrials threatening the world, a couple time traveling back to a critical battle, a deranged husband chasing his wife, and many more memorable people…
See More
Anne Frank On Tour and Other Stories
This lively collection offers literary short stories founded on History, Love, Need, Excess, and Final Acts.
See More
In lucid prose author George Thomas Clark recalls the challenges of growing up in a family beset by divorce, depression, and alcoholism, and battling similar problems as an adult.
See More
Let’s invite many of the greatest boxers and their contemporaries to tell their own stories, some true, others tales based on history. The result is a fascinating look into the lives and battles of those who thrilled millions but often ruined themselves while so doing.
See More
In a rousing trip through the worlds of basketball and football, George Thomas Clark explores the professional basketball league in Mexico, the Herculean talents of Wilt Chamberlain, the artistry of LeBron James, the brilliance of Bill Walsh, and lots more. Half the stories are nonfiction and others are satirical pieces guided by the unwavering hand of an inspired storyteller.
See More
Get on board this collection of satirical stories, based on news, about the entertaining but absurd and often quite dangerous events following the election of President Donald J. Trump in November 2016 until January 6, 2021, shortly after his loss to Joe Biden.
See More
Join Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush and other notables on a raucous ride into a fictional world infused with facts from one of the roughest political races in modern U.S. history.
See More
History and literary fiction enliven the Barack Obama phenomenon from the African roots of his father and grandfather to the United States where young Obama struggles to control vices and establish his racial identity. Soon, the young politician is soaring but under fire from a variety of adversaries including Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, and Rush Limbaugh.
See More
These satirical columns allow startlingly candid Saddam Hussein and George W. Bush to explain their need to control the destinies of countries, regions, and, ultimately, the world. Osama bin Laden, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Karl Rove, and other notables, not all famous, also demand part of the stage.
See More
Where Will We Sleep
Determined to learn more about those who fate did not favor, the author toured tattered, handmade refuges of those without homes and interviewed them on the streets and in homeless shelters, and conversed with the poor in the United States, Mexico, Ecuador, and Spain, and on occasion wrote composite stories to illuminate their difficult lives.
See More
In search of stimulating stories, the author interviewed prostitutes in Madrid, Mexico City, Havana, and Managua and on many boulevards in the United States, and he talked to detectives and rode the rough roads of social workers who deal with human trafficking, which is contemporary slavery, and sometimes used several lives to create stories, and everywhere he ventured he witnessed struggles of those whose lives are bound In Other Hands.
See More
In compressed language Clark presents a compilation of short stories and creative columns about relationships between men and women.
See More